Bills could have given Ravens a blueprint on how to attack Steelers’ defense. Buffalo ran for 249 yard on 51 carries. This is the most rushing yard Pittsburgh has allowed in a home game since 1975.

The Ravens are ranked No. The Ravens have the No.

Baltimore is only 24th in rushing success rate, according to Luke Jones of Baltimore Positive. Baltimore Positive wrote that the problem was ranking 24th in rush success rate. While waiting for Henry’s run to go, too many rushes create second-and third-and long situations.

Henry was not allowed to carry the ball against the Bengals in the second half after he had rushed for 33 yard and scored a touchdown in the first.

Harbaugh stated on Monday that although the Ravens were “a running team”, “the circumstances of this game led us to that direction.”

The Athletic’s Jeff Zrebiec agreed to Harbaugh’s assessment. Zrebiec agreed that the Ravens could have used more running, but he felt “the criticism” was overblown.

Zrebiec wrote, “There were plenty of opportunities for them to run during their first drive in the second quarter. But it’s difficult to complain when the possession would have ended in a touchdown if Isaiah Likely hadn’t fumbled while he was going to score.” The Ravens then played their two-minute offense the remainder of the second quarter.

“To begin the third quarter, Henry received the ball twice and gained 5 yards in total. The Ravens then went three-and out. Baltimore, despite trailing 12 points in the third quarter at the time, stuck to the running game, which culminated in a touchdown drive that was culminated by an 18-yard scamper from Keaton Mitchell. The Ravens were on hurry-up offense for most of the fourth quarter as they trailed two touchdowns. You’re only talking about one or two drives in which you might have questioned why the Ravens didn’t run a few plays. Notable, yes. “But hardly a reason why the Ravens lost the game.”